JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 24, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Rosalba Ines Jaramillo Murillo

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Súplica Presentado Contra El Auto Del 2 De Mayo De 2006, Proferido Por El Magistrado Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa, Que Rechazó La Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Presentada Por Rosalba Inés Jaramillo Murillo. Imposibilidad De Utilizar El Recurso De Súplica Como Instancia Para La Adición De La Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad. Inmutabilidad De La Cosa Juzgada Constitucional. Inoponibilidad De Decisiones Posteriores Frente A Las Sentencias Adoptadas En Procesos De Constitucionalidad. Identidad De Los Problemas Jurídicos Respecto De Los Analizados En La Sentencia Que Declaró La Cosa Juzgada Constitucional. Confirma El Auto De Rechazo De La Demanda
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica
  • Improcedencia para adicionar demanda de inconstitucionalidad
  • Definición
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el Auto del 2 de mayo de 2006, proferido por el Magistrado Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa, que rechazó la demanda presentada por la ciudadana Rosalba Inés Jaramillo Murillo contra el parágrafo 1º (parcial) del artículo 33 de la Ley 100 de 1993.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.